【Defendant】Xue
[Reason] Unsatisfied with the expropriation decision
Xue has a homestead in this town, and the county people's government issued a collective land construction land use certificate for him. In 2012, the county government started the construction of a new city, and subsequently issued a government awareness expropriation and compensation plan. At the end of the second year, the Shanxi Provincial Government approved the city's urban master plan, requiring the acceleration of the construction of the northern new area. In June 2016, the county government made a decision to expropriate Xue's house and served it to Xue. Xue was dissatisfied with the expropriation compensation and entrusted Yingting Law Firm to file a lawsuit on his behalf.
After a court trial, they all ruled that the county government's expropriation decision procedure was illegal and revoked the county government's expropriation decision. The county government was dissatisfied and appealed.
In the end, the Provincial High Court still supported the appeals of lawyer Ying Ting and Xue, ruling that the county government's expropriation decision was illegal.
![[Analysis of Winning Cases] A Shanxi High Court verdict supported the appeals of the demolished persons](https://www.bjyingting.com/uploads/allimg/191217/13200A060-0.jpg)
【Case summary】
The demolished people resolutely defended their rights in accordance with the law and finally obtained legal protection, so that their legitimate rights and interests were upheld. Each demolished person's choice is different, and the results of rights protection will be different.
Related tags: