Beijing Yingtong Law Firm has focused on the protection of the rights and interests of private enterprises for many years. It has represented many corporate rights protection cases in the legal practice of rights protection in natural resources, mining, land, waters, territorial space, corporate equity, criminal defense, factory demolition, environmental protection shutdown, prohibition and vacation, etc., including large-scale real estate...
The People's Court of Ye County, Henan Province heard the case of Guo xx's illegal demolition.
Home page >> Ying Ting Information >> Yingting news
Article author：Yingting Lawyers Group | Update time：2019-12-17 | Reading times：652
Court opening announcement
Henan Province Ye County People's Court tried GuoxxA case of illegal demolition.
Court opening announcement: By our firmWang Qingfenglawyer,Lu JiananGuo represented by lawyerxxThe illegal demolition case against the Zhanhe Branch of the Pingdingshan Municipal Bureau of Land and Resources, the Housing and Urban-Rural Development Bureau of Pingdingshan Zhanhe District, the Zhanhe Branch of the Pingdingshan Urban and Rural Planning Bureau, and the Mazhuang Street Office of the Zhanhe District People’s Government of Pingdingshan City will be filed in2019year9month26morning9:00, the trial was held at the People's Court of Ye County, Henan Province.
Brief introduction to the case:
2018year11month7On the same day, the four defendants jointly issued a "Notice" to the plaintiff, believing that the plaintiff was located inxxxThe three-story brick-concrete building built violated the provisions of the "Land Management Law of the People's Republic of China", the "Urban and Rural Planning Law of the People's Republic of China" and other laws and regulations, and was an illegal construction act. The four defendants2019year4month4Japan United illegally and forcibly demolished two of the plaintiff's houses. The plaintiff holds a legal "Village and Town House Ownership Certificate". The four defendants illegally and forcibly demolished the plaintiff's house without issuing any written documents or reaching a compensation agreement. The plaintiff believes that the four defendants do not have the qualifications to be a law enforcement entity and have no legal basis. The forced demolition is illegal and infringes upon the plaintiff's legitimate rights and interests. Therefore, he filed this lawsuit and hopes that the court can protect the plaintiff's legitimate rights and interests. The case is now under review.
Previous article：The Higher People's Court of Henan Province heard the case of Zhang xx's illegal demolition.
Recommended reading
- Mineral rights mortgage financing: a new financing path for private mining companies
- Should the government’s investment promotion agreement be scrapped at the drop of a hat? The law has your back!
- Mining in the name of land leveling? The Central Inspection Team is exposed! Mine bosses, please don’t step into this trap.
- Mining license renewal delayed? The new regulations stipulate that a reply must be made within 15 days
- New opportunities for administrative reconsideration: increased litigation winning rate, smoother rights protection channels
- Mineral rights mortgage financing: a new financing path for private mining companies
- Should the government’s investment promotion agreement be scrapped at the drop of a hat? The law has your back!
- Mining in the name of land leveling? The Central Inspection Team is exposed! Mine bosses, please don’t step into this trap.
- Are companies being fined too much for small things? Court: The punishment is inappropriate and must be corrected!
- New opportunities for administrative reconsideration: increased litigation winning rate, smoother rights protection channels
