Lawyer team

Dong Guonv

Lawyer Dong Guonv, university professor, director of Beijing Yingting Law Firm

Practice areas

Government-enterprise disputes and administrative litigation, real estate and construction projects, mineral resources and environmental protection, dispute resolution, litigation and non-litigation

social duties

Member of the China Law Society, member of the All-China Lawyers Association, member of the Beijing Lawyers Association, corporate legal advisor of Chaoyang District, Beijing, and member of the Administrative Litigation Committee

Main practice experience

A practicing lawyer with more than 20 years of experience in government-enterprise disputes and a legal practitioner in the field of administrative litigation. He is good at handling administrative litigation, government-enterprise disputes, administrative agreement disputes, shutdowns and vacancies, idle land recovery, natural resource disputes, and maritime rights disputes. Known as an administrative litigation lawyer who knows better about safeguarding corporate rights and interests. Since practicing law in 2002, he has been mainly engaged in administrative litigation of large and medium-sized enterprises, government-enterprise disputes and other difficult legal issues, involving investment projects, corporate relocation, land recovery, mineral resource suppression, maritime rights disputes, corporate restructuring and bankruptcy and other legal services.

Practice philosophy

Adhere to rigor, pursue pragmatism, have the courage to innovate, and are committed to handling every case to the extreme. Through unremitting efforts and professional wisdom, we awaken sleeping rights and defend the boundaries of justice. Unswervingly fight for justice and ensure that every rights and interests are upheld under the sun.

Selected as "Outstanding Professional Administrative Litigation Lawyer in Building a Moderately Prosperous Society in an All-round Way in 2020" by "Outstanding Chinese Contemporary Lawyers" and "China Legal Yearbook"

Representative performance (part)

1. The case of a Taiwanese business enterprise whose land was planned to be unavailable for construction was selected as a typical representative case of administrative litigation. It was the first district-level defendant in the country to appear in court and was followed up and reported by many media in Beijing.
2. Won the lawsuit against the Land and Resources Management Committee and revoked the land penalty notice. Based on the existing facts and combined with existing laws and regulations and other important evidence, the case was successfully judged.
3. In the first case of the Tianjin Court, the expropriator failed to conduct a hearing and was ruled to “revoke the administrative agency’s expropriation decision.” The expropriated person won the lawsuit
4. Langfang Moubao Decoration Materials Co., Ltd., Beijing’s “Greater Seventh Ring Road” expressway demolition dispute case, successfully concluded in 9 days
5. When a certain investment promotion company built a 4A-level tourist attraction and encountered water source protection that required expropriation, it successfully defended its rights within 7 days. Hearing applications were submitted to various departments and lawyer letters were issued to avoid huge losses for the company.
6. The urban construction administrative case of a beer culture experience hall in Qingdao was selected as one of the top ten typical cases of optimizing the business environment in Shandong Province in 2020.
7. Zhang sued a certain district administrative agency for administrative notification of information disclosure. He clearly stated his case handling ideas and submitted 12 pieces of evidence to the court, and won the case.
8. A highway project company in Loudi demolished the case and won the case against a municipal administrative agency for state compensation for failing to perform its duties of housing site resettlement.
9. In a certain incident in Taiyuan, a compensation case for demolition of a house restructured by a state-owned enterprise was finally recognized as a commercial house, and the total compensation was increased by 34 times.
10. It only took 2 months for a mechanical and chemical company to win the lawsuit, and the compensation was increased by 1.5 times. In the end, the parties were compensated according to law as they wished, and the conflict was resolved without litigation, achieving a win-win situation for all parties.