State compensation

In the case of Qiu Mou and others in Ganzhou, Jiangxi Province reviewing the decision to restrict demolition, the People's Government of Zhanggong District, Ganzhou City made an administrative review decision in accordance with the law, confirming that the decision to restrict demolition was illegal due to "insufficient main evidence and illegal procedures"
【Case Introduction】
Qiu built a two-story house on the residential land, which was later included in the expropriation scope.

We focus on administrative litigation and rights protection cases for medium and large enterprises, and boldly explore, summarizing a number of unique methods for resolving government-enterprise disputes and administrative litigation cases. We have solved the problems of government-enterprise disputes for many medium-sized and large enterprises, successfully improved the benefits due to administrative counterparts in accordance with the law, and have won the trust of the majority of business owners.

The town government determined that the house was an illegal building and made a "decision ordering the demolition of the illegal building within a time limit." In order to protect their legitimate rights and interests, the parties concerned submitted toCorporate demolition lawyerAsk for help
【Case handling process】
After accepting Qiu's entrustment, the Beijing enterprise demolition lawyer guided the client to file an administrative review.

[Judgment Result] It is confirmed that the "Decision Letter Ordering the Demolition of Illegal Buildings within a Time Limit" issued by the People's Government of Shuidong Town, Zhanggong District, Ganzhou City, the respondent, has insufficient evidence and illegal procedures.

The legal knowledge in this article does not represent legal advice. If you encounter similar problems, you should analyze them in detail. If you want to know more about this, you can consult a lawyer on this site for one-on-one online consultation.