land expropriation

After Mr. Li’s house in Changshu was included in the scope of expropriation, the sub-district office issued a time-limited demolition notice in violation of legal procedures. After the lawyer intervened, the superior department confirmed during the review process that the demolition notice was illegal!
【Case Introduction】
Mr. Li owns a homestead house in Changshu City, which was included in the scope of expropriation. Since the compensation fee was too low and could not guarantee the current living standard of Mr. Li and his family, Mr. Li sought legal help from Beijing Yingting Law Firm.

During the progress of the case, the local sub-district office issued a demolition notice to Mr. Li on the grounds that his house was illegal, and accordingly, some of Mr. Li's houses were forcibly demolished.
【Case handling process】
After Beijing Yingtong Law Firm accepted the entrustment, it immediately assigned lawyers to carry out the work and communicated with the client many times.

During the investigation, it was found that the facts identified in the demolition notice issued by the sub-district office were incorrect and that legal procedures were not violated when the notice was issued. Therefore, the parties were instructed to file an application for administrative review of the notice.
【Judgment Result】
After thorough argumentation by the lawyer, the Changshu Municipal People's Government made an administrative review decision after ascertaining the facts, confirming that the demolition notice issued by the sub-district office did not protect Mr. Li's right to legal relief, so the demolition notice issued by it was illegal.

The legal knowledge in this article does not represent legal advice. If you encounter similar problems, you should analyze them in detail. If you want to know more about this, you can consult a lawyer on this site for one-on-one online consultation.