land expropriation

Mr. Wu of Nanning City sued the Nanning City Urban Management Comprehensive Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau to revoke the decision to demolish within a time limit. The court of first instance fully adopted the lawyer’s point of view and decided to revoke the decision to demolish within a time limit and the administrative review decision!
[Case Introduction]
Teacher Wu owns a house in a community in Nanning, which was included in the scope of expropriation by the local government in 2020.

In order to speed up the expropriation process and reduce expropriation costs, the local Comprehensive Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau made a decision to demolish illegal buildings within a time limit, requiring the parties to demolish the houses involved within a time limit and then seek help from lawyers from law firms.

Beijing Yingting Law Firm handles many complex dispute cases in the field of administrative litigation and has a profound theoretical foundation and practical experience. Use solid legal knowledge and theoretical literacy to study a series of legal issues in administrative litigation, and have accumulated rich experience in handling cases in many aspects such as house demolition disputes, agricultural land expropriation and conversion disputes, illegal construction disputes, administrative agreements, administrative promises, land rights confirmation, land contract contracts, civil contracts, etc. We always practice the concepts of rigorous, realistic, civilized and just rule of law and strive to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of our clients.

Through understanding and communication with the parties, they learned that the decision of the Comprehensive Law Enforcement Bureau to demolish the area within a certain period of time was obviously illegal. They immediately filed an administrative review with the local government. The district government made a review decision and upheld the decision to demolish the area within a certain period of time. The legal team instructed the client to file an administrative lawsuit with the Xingning District People's Court of Nanning City regarding these two decisions.

[Judgment result]
After full argumentation by the lawyer, the first-instance court fully adopted the lawyer's point of view and determined that the comprehensive law enforcement bureau's decision had insufficient evidence and unclear facts. When the district government made the reconsideration decision, the facts of the case were also unclear and the main evidence was insufficient. The first-instance court ruled to revoke the demolition reconsideration decision.

The legal knowledge in this article does not represent legal advice. If you encounter similar problems, you should analyze them in detail. If you want to know more about this, you can consult a lawyer on this site for one-on-one online consultation.