administrative agreement

A particularly important step in the demolition is the signing of a resettlement compensation agreement, which also "contains" the tricks of the demolition party.
During the handling of a case, many of the parties involved in the dismantling lawyer suffered losses when signing compensation agreements.
After the resettlement agreement was signed, the demolition party found a good excuse.

"The company's seal cannot be taken outside, so you need to take the agreement back, stamp it, and then send it back." At this time, we should be vigilant and must not agree to such a request.
First of all, let’s look at the demolition party’s so-called “recovery” of the seal. This reason cannot be trusted at all. The conventional procedure for signing a compensation agreement is basically to bring the demolished people together to sign a unified contract, and take the initiative to sign the agreement without stamping.

Isn't this an obvious trap?
So at this time, not only should we not believe this statement, but we should also remind other relatives, friends and neighbors to avoid being deceived. In addition, under normal circumstances, we cannot agree that the compensation agreement is made in triplicate, with the demolition party having one copy, us, and the other being kept on file. The demolition party insists on taking all of it.

Professional demolition lawyers consult and handle multiple complex dispute cases in the field of administrative litigation, with profound theoretical foundation and practical experience. Use solid legal knowledge and theoretical literacy to study a series of legal issues in administrative litigation, and have accumulated rich experience in handling cases in many aspects such as house demolition disputes, agricultural land expropriation and conversion disputes, illegal construction disputes, administrative agreements, administrative promises, land rights confirmation, land contract contracts, civil contracts, etc. We always practice the concepts of rigorous, realistic, civilized and just rule of law and strive to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of our clients.

I don’t emphasize here that you cannot sign a blank agreement. I believe everyone has a clear understanding.
Secondly, we say that we cannot compromise with the other party's behavior of taking away all the agreement, but if you cannot resist for various reasons, what you need to do at this time is to preserve the evidence in time. The purpose of the other party's insistence on taking away the agreement is mostly to tamper with the content of the agreement. We can reduce the risk of modifying the content of the agreement by retaining evidence.

What we can do is to promptly save the evidence of taking audio recordings, videos, photos, etc. Secondly, we can sign every page of the agreement to prevent the content from being replaced.
I would like to remind everyone that after the agreement was taken away by the demolition party, the other party sent back another copy and told us that the same effect would not affect anything.

What needs to be made clear here is that legally the copy and the original have different effects. When encountering a compensation dispute, if the demolished person only uses the copy of the agreement as evidence to claim rights without other evidence to support it, then the claim may not be supported by the court.
If the demolition party insists on only providing a copy, we can ask them to sign and stamp the copy, indicating that the copy is as valid as the original signed by both parties.

Demolition is a long-term struggle one after another. If you find clues that the other party has the above behavior during the demolition process, then you must understand that the other party's "sincerity" for legal demolition is not high. With this knowledge, you can quickly crack one routine after another.

The legal knowledge in this article does not represent legal advice. If you encounter similar problems, you should analyze them in detail. If you want to know more about this, you can consult a professional demolition lawyer on this site for one-on-one online consultation.