Law firm introduction More》

Beijing Yingtong Law Firm has focused on the protection of the rights and interests of private enterprises for many years. It has represented many corporate rights protection cases in the legal practice of rights protection in natural resources, mining, land, waters, territorial space, corporate equity, criminal defense, factory demolition, environmental protection shutdown, prohibition and vacation, etc., including large-scale real estate...

Law firm personnel More》
Visiting address More》

The Intermediate People's Court of Qiannan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture in Guizhou Province heard the expropriation compensation case (1)

Home page >> Ying Ting Information >> Yingting news

Article author:Yingting Lawyers Group | Update time:2019-05-13 | Reading times:1075

The Intermediate People's Court of Qiannan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture in Guizhou Province heard the expropriation compensation case (1)
Court opening announcement:
By our firmWang Qingfenglawyer,Lu JiananThe plaintiff Cheng xx, represented by a lawyer, sued the defendant Changshun County People's Government to confirm compensation for forced demolition losses. The case will be heard at 9:30 a.m. on May 14, 2019, in the Seventh Court of the Intermediate People's Court of Qiannan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Guizhou Province.
Brief introduction to the case:
The plaintiff’s house was forcibly demolished, resulting in the loss of the plaintiff’s house and property inside and outside the house. The defendant’s illegal forced demolition behavior has been confirmed by the Administrative Judgment No. 80, Qian 27 Xingchu (2017) of the Qiannan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture Intermediate People’s Court of Guizhou Province. The Changshun County People’s Government’s forced demolition behavior is illegal. On September 25, 2018, the plaintiff mailed the "State Compensation Application" and relevant evidence materials to the defendant. On November 24, 2018, the plaintiff received the defendant's (Changfuxing Compensation Decision [2018]) No. xx "Decision on Non-compensation" The plaintiff believed that the defendant's decision not to compensate was illegal and that the plaintiff should be compensated for all property losses. Therefore, in accordance with the provisions of Articles 2 and 36 of the "State Compensation Law of the People's Republic of China", a lawsuit was filed with the court. This case is currently under trial.
Related tags: