Law firm introduction More》
Beijing Yingtong Law Firm has focused on the protection of the rights and interests of private enterprises for many years. It has represented many corporate rights protection cases in the legal practice of rights protection in natural resources, mining, land, waters, territorial space, corporate equity, criminal defense, factory demolition, environmental protection shutdown, prohibition and vacation, etc., including large-scale real estate...
Law firm services
Law firm personnel More》
Visiting address More》
On November 29, 2019, the case of canceling administrative actions was submitted to the Administrative Comprehensive Office of the People's Court of Weidu District, Xuchang, Henan Province.
Home page >> Ying Ting Information >> Yingting news
Article author：Yingting Lawyers Group | Update time：2019-12-17 | Reading times：1193
The case of revoking the administrative action was held in the Administrative Comprehensive Tribunal of the People's Court of Weidu District, Xuchang, Henan Province
The case of Mr. Wang, the plaintiff represented by our lawyer Zhang Fengbin and trainee lawyer Zhang Yue, sued the defendant Xuchang Municipal Ecological Environment Bureau for requesting to revoke the "Administrative Reconsideration Decision" made by him. The case was held at 8:30 am on November 29, 2019 in Xuchang, Henan Province.
The Administrative Comprehensive Tribunal of Weidu District People's Court held a hearing.
Brief introduction to the case: The plaintiff is from Zaowang Village, Chuhe Township, Yuzhou City, Henan Province. Since the location involves expropriation, in order to understand the expropriation situation, the plaintiff filed a government information disclosure application with the Yuzhou Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau. After investigation, it was found that the defendant had signed for the information disclosure application materials on June 27, 2019. According to relevant legal provisions, the Yuzhou Environmental Protection Bureau should respond to the plaintiff before July 25, 2019. However, until August 13, 2019, the Yuzhou Environmental Protection Bureau did not inform the plaintiff of the extension of the response period, and did not explain the reason. Therefore, the plaintiff filed an administrative review with the defendant. During the review period, the Yuzhou Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau only mailed part of the information disclosure application content to the plaintiff, but did not attach a notification statement or other information disclosure content required for the plaintiff's application. In this case, the plaintiff received the "Administrative Reconsideration Decision" from the defendant. The plaintiff believed that the administrative action taken by the defendant was illegal.
The case of Mr. Wang, the plaintiff represented by our lawyer Zhang Fengbin and trainee lawyer Zhang Yue, sued the defendant Xuchang Municipal Ecological Environment Bureau for requesting to revoke the "Administrative Reconsideration Decision" made by him. The case was held at 8:30 am on November 29, 2019 in Xuchang, Henan Province.
The Administrative Comprehensive Tribunal of Weidu District People's Court held a hearing.
Brief introduction to the case: The plaintiff is from Zaowang Village, Chuhe Township, Yuzhou City, Henan Province. Since the location involves expropriation, in order to understand the expropriation situation, the plaintiff filed a government information disclosure application with the Yuzhou Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau. After investigation, it was found that the defendant had signed for the information disclosure application materials on June 27, 2019. According to relevant legal provisions, the Yuzhou Environmental Protection Bureau should respond to the plaintiff before July 25, 2019. However, until August 13, 2019, the Yuzhou Environmental Protection Bureau did not inform the plaintiff of the extension of the response period, and did not explain the reason. Therefore, the plaintiff filed an administrative review with the defendant. During the review period, the Yuzhou Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau only mailed part of the information disclosure application content to the plaintiff, but did not attach a notification statement or other information disclosure content required for the plaintiff's application. In this case, the plaintiff received the "Administrative Reconsideration Decision" from the defendant. The plaintiff believed that the administrative action taken by the defendant was illegal.
Recommended reading
- Mineral rights mortgage financing: a new financing path for private mining companies
- Should the government’s investment promotion agreement be scrapped at the drop of a hat? The law has your back!
- Mining in the name of land leveling? The Central Inspection Team is exposed! Mine bosses, please don’t step into this trap.
- Mining license renewal delayed? The new regulations stipulate that a reply must be made within 15 days
- New opportunities for administrative reconsideration: increased litigation winning rate, smoother rights protection channels
- Mineral rights mortgage financing: a new financing path for private mining companies
- Should the government’s investment promotion agreement be scrapped at the drop of a hat? The law has your back!
- Mining in the name of land leveling? The Central Inspection Team is exposed! Mine bosses, please don’t step into this trap.
- Are companies being fined too much for small things? Court: The punishment is inappropriate and must be corrected!
- New opportunities for administrative reconsideration: increased litigation winning rate, smoother rights protection channels
