Law firm introduction More》
Beijing Yingtong Law Firm has focused on the protection of the rights and interests of private enterprises for many years. It has represented many corporate rights protection cases in the legal practice of rights protection in natural resources, mining, land, waters, territorial space, corporate equity, criminal defense, factory demolition, environmental protection shutdown, prohibition and vacation, etc., including large-scale real estate...
Law firm services
Law firm personnel More》
Visiting address More》
Summary of corporate demolition litigation cases by Beijing Yingting Lawyers Group
Home page >> Ying Ting Information >> Yingting news
Article author：Yingting Lawyers Group | Update time：2019-04-15 | Reading times：1596
Summary of corporate demolition litigation cases by Beijing Yingting Lawyers Group
——For enterprise demolition, choose the professional Beijing Yingtong Lawyers Group
1. During the construction of Beijing's "Greater Seventh Ring Road" expressway, a building materials company defended its rights and concluded the case within 9 days of entrustment. In the end, the expressway bypassed the company and the business owners' demands were met without demolition;
2. The APEC meeting in Beijing resulted in the demolition of a building materials market. The government compensated according to collective enterprise standards. After rights protection, the enterprise was finally recognized as a commercial house on state-owned land, and the compensation standard was increased several times;
3. A Taiwanese-invested enterprise in Beijing acquired land through transfer and was unable to construct due to planning changes. After three years of rights protection, the district government finally agreed to expropriate the land at market prices, with a compensation amount of more than 300 million yuan;
4. A company in Taiyuan purchased a house restructured by a state-owned enterprise. The house was finally recognized as a commercial house, and the total compensation increased by 34 times;
5. A well-known domestic food company in Baotou was demolished, and the state-owned land compensation ultimately exceeded the market auction price by 20%;
6. For the demolition of a building materials company in Baoding, in addition to monetary compensation, more than 80 acres of state-owned construction land were finally obtained as resettlement compensation for development;
7. After a large shipbuilding company in Ningde cooperated with the government to obtain land and put it into production, the government introduced new projects and preliminarily evicted the shipbuilding company. After three months of rights protection, the provincial government attached great importance to it and finally received satisfactory compensation in accordance with the law;
8. An auto parts manufacturing company in Nanping (secondary automobile supplier) needed to demolish an urban road. After safeguarding its rights, the road was re-planned to bypass the company, and the business owner's demands were met without demolition;
9. A garment processing company in Quanzhou was demolished during the construction of the Fuzhou-Xiamen Passenger Railway High-speed Railway. After safeguarding its rights, the government actively negotiated and the compensation amount was increased from 45 million yuan to 90 million yuan;
10. A real estate development company in Qingyuan had a dispute during the land transfer process. During the rights protection process, it won all 4 litigation cases and 1 arbitration case, and successfully safeguarded the rights of 350 million assets;
11. A carton processing company in Zunyi (supplier of Maotai liquor) provided consulting services at the beginning of the demolition, checked for leaks and filled in the gaps, and finally received satisfactory compensation;
12. A commercial enterprise with a facade in an urban village in Langfang was demolished due to real estate development and was finally determined to be compensated in accordance with the compensation standards for houses on state-owned land;
13. A foundry company in Tangshan was unable to continue production due to an error in the government's issuance of a state-owned land certificate. After safeguarding its rights, the government actively negotiated for reissue procedures and promised compensation to avoid a loss of 130 million yuan;
14. A logistics company in Shijiazhuang, covering an area of 3,000 acres, was demolished due to the county government’s policy adjustment. After two years of rights protection, the court finally ruled that the government should compensate according to law to avoid a loss of 300 million yuan;
15. For a clothing company in Zhengzhou, due to the demolition of Shangdeng Expressway, the final compensation was increased by 5 million yuan;
16. A refractory material company in Zhengzhou was given a compensation of 20 million yuan due to the demolition required for the construction of Shangdeng Expressway. After safeguarding its rights, the leaders of the provincial party committee and government attached great importance to it. The final compensation amount reached 28 million yuan, and it received resettlement compensation of 100 acres of industrial land, worth more than 30 million yuan;
17. A real estate company in Zhengzhou operates a second-hand car market of more than 100,000 square meters. Due to urban construction and demolition, it took five years to defend its rights. The leaders of the provincial party committee and government attached great importance to it. In the end, the court confirmed that the government violated the law and the compensation amount exceeded 1 billion yuan;
18. A building materials company in Wuhan was demolished due to the renovation of a village in the city. It was treated as illegal demolition, and it was finally determined that the company's houses were compensated according to legal standards;
19. A breeding enterprise in Nantong needed to be demolished due to environmental protection. After rights protection, it was confirmed that the government's demolition was illegal and compensation was obtained in accordance with the law;
20. A commercial house with a street frontage of more than 5,000 square meters in Xuzhou was demolished due to urban construction. The compensation standard was 6,000 yuan/square meter, which was significantly lower than the market price. After safeguarding the rights, the court revoked the expropriation decision and re-expropriated the house with a compensation standard of 30,000 yuan/square meter. The High Court ruled to compensate for the business losses during the two expropriations;
21. A certain cemetery operating company in Jining was repossessed due to the need for urban development, and only the ground objects were compensated. After safeguarding their rights, the government took it back according to the market price according to the law;
22. An agricultural cooperative in Ji'an was not compensated for the price of fruit trees during land expropriation. After safeguarding its rights, the compensation standard was increased several times and satisfactory compensation was obtained;
23. The government required the construction of a 4,000-square-meter seaside hotel in Dalian, but the formalities were not completed due to historical reasons. Since Luneng Real Estate’s commercial complex development needed to be demolished, the government only compensated according to collective standards. After rights protection, compensation was based on commercial houses on state-owned land, and the compensation amount was increased several times;
24. A hydraulic company in Fushun signed a state-owned land transfer contract with the government for the resettlement land after the demolition of the original factory building, but failed to actually provide the land for two years. After safeguarding its rights, the court determined that the government had breached the contract and compensated the company for all losses.
25. A high-tech construction materials company in Baotou was demolished due to urban construction. The compensation standard for the demolition of state-owned land enterprises was based on collective land compensation. After safeguarding rights, it was resolved through negotiation and legal and satisfactory compensation was obtained;
26. A food processing enterprise in Guyuan needed to be demolished due to real estate development. After rights protection, compensation for losses from production and business suspension and compensation for house replacement were increased;
27. A certain commercial enterprise in Dezhou was demolished due to railway bridge construction. After safeguarding its rights, the government actively negotiated a settlement and finally received satisfactory compensation;
28. A well-known ceramics factory in Dezhou was demolished due to the construction and demolition of the Shijiazhuang-Jiji high-speed rail project. The purchased state-owned enterprise was restructured and was recognized as collective land and buildings for compensation. After safeguarding its rights, provincial government leaders attached great importance to it and finally compensated it according to the standards of houses on state-owned land. The compensation amount was doubled to 90 million yuan;
29. A steel structure company in Liaocheng was determined to be an illegal building due to urban construction demolition. After safeguarding its rights, it was determined to be a legal building and compensated according to law;
30. A real estate company in Weihai purchased a factory restructured by a state-owned enterprise and was compensated according to the standards for collective housing. After rights protection, the compensation was based on the standards for houses on state-owned land;
31. A coking company in Luliang was required to pay 12 million yuan in compensation due to the construction and demolition of an industrial park. After safeguarding its rights, the government actively negotiated and evaluated, and the final compensation was 27 million yuan;
32. A commercial house with a facade of 3,000 square meters in Taiyuan was demolished due to urban road construction. The compensation amount was only a few hundred yuan per square meter. After safeguarding the rights, the court revoked the road planning and construction approval documents. The court confirmed that the demolition was illegal and compensation was provided in accordance with the law;
33. A biotechnology company in Changzhi was demolished during the Tajiao high-speed railway construction and was only compensated according to collective ground property standards. After safeguarding its rights, it was agreed to increase compensation for losses caused by suspension of production and business and raise the ground property compensation standard;
34. A pasta processing enterprise in Baoji was demolished due to highway construction. After investigation and evidence collection, the government actively negotiated and finally obtained legal compensation;
35. A gas station in Xi'an was demolished due to urban construction. After safeguarding rights and providing compensation in accordance with the law, the government agreed to relocate and build;
36. A processing company in Shanghai needed to be demolished due to real estate development and construction. After signing a compensation agreement, the government delayed in providing the land for resettlement. After safeguarding its rights, the court ruled that the government had breached the contract and required compensation for breach of contract losses;
37. 200 industrial enterprises in Urumqi were demolished due to urban construction and were treated as illegal construction. After rights protection, they were compensated as legal construction, with a total amount of several billion yuan;
38. An export-oriented pharmaceutical company in Huzhou leased a state-owned enterprise factory for production, and urban construction required demolition. It was only given relocation fees. After rights protection, the government compensation increased the compensation for the loss of production and business suspension, of which the liquidated damages alone amounted to 60 million yuan;
39. A university science and technology enterprise in Hangzhou needs to be demolished due to urban development. It only pays compensation for the factory building. After rights protection, compensation for losses due to suspension of production and business operations will be increased;
40. A university chemical company in Nantong relocated due to environmental protection needs, and only paid less than 100 million yuan in relocation expenses. After rights protection, the government actively coordinated and increased the compensation to 150 million yuan, and also provided land resettlement compensation;
41. A rice processing enterprise in Jiaxing needed to be demolished due to river reconstruction. After safeguarding its rights, it issued a legal opinion. Government leaders attached great importance to it and actively coordinated to obtain satisfactory compensation;
42. A large hotel in Ningbo purchased a state-owned enterprise house for commercial use. The government only compensated according to factory building standards. After safeguarding its rights, after detailed investigation and evidence collection, it obtained evidence that the enterprise paid land use fees according to commercial land. Finally, the compensation was based on commercial houses on state-owned land, and the compensation was increased by tens of millions;
43. A chemical company in Wenzhou was demolished due to the construction of the Ningbo-Taiwan Expressway and was compensated at cost price. After safeguarding its rights, the court confirmed that the county government's demolition was illegal and the compensation was increased in accordance with the law;
Next article：Ying Zai Demolition Law Firm—Demolition Consultation in Langfang, Hebei Province—Stop 301
Recommended reading
- Mineral rights mortgage financing: a new financing path for private mining companies
- Should the government’s investment promotion agreement be scrapped at the drop of a hat? The law has your back!
- Mining in the name of land leveling? The Central Inspection Team is exposed! Mine bosses, please don’t step into this trap.
- Mining license renewal delayed? The new regulations stipulate that a reply must be made within 15 days
- New opportunities for administrative reconsideration: increased litigation winning rate, smoother rights protection channels
- Mineral rights mortgage financing: a new financing path for private mining companies
- Should the government’s investment promotion agreement be scrapped at the drop of a hat? The law has your back!
- Mining in the name of land leveling? The Central Inspection Team is exposed! Mine bosses, please don’t step into this trap.
- Are companies being fined too much for small things? Court: The punishment is inappropriate and must be corrected!
- New opportunities for administrative reconsideration: increased litigation winning rate, smoother rights protection channels
